Es mostren els missatges amb l'etiqueta de comentaris Chinese Studies. Mostrar tots els missatges
Es mostren els missatges amb l'etiqueta de comentaris Chinese Studies. Mostrar tots els missatges

Commemorating the anonymous. British imperialist discourse in China and its backlash among the Irish

Sean Golden gave a talk on "Commemorating the anonymous. British imperialist discourse in China and its backlash among the Irish" at the  First Annual Conference of the  Irish Association for Asian Studies (IAAS) at Dublin City University (Ireland), 17-18/06/2016.

.
Abstract

John Mitchel on his way to exile conversed with naval officers responsible for British conquests in China. In his translation of the 三字經 Sanzijing, Sir Herbert Giles, an English diplomat in China, glossed jiā as ‘a pig beneath a roof’, and remarked to his intended British readership that ‘our’ Irish neighbours would certainly understand this. His discourse demonstrates the effects of attempting to master the colonised ‘abroad’ on his attitudes toward the colonised ‘at home’. Anonymous Irish soldiers and police helped colonise the British Empire. Some later turned against colonisation and fought to liberate Ireland and other colonies. The major source of information about the Taiping movement in Nanjing in the mid-nineteenth century was an anonymous Irishman who became a mercenary. Roger Casement went from being an agent of imperialism to an agent of the Easter Rising; his reports on colonisation in Africa and in Latin America inspired Joseph Conrad to write Heart of Darkness and Nostromo. W.G. Sebald, starting from the connection between Casement and Conrad, portrayed in The Rings of Saturn the decadence that British imperialism produced at home. Postcolonial studies tend to concentrate on the experience of the colonised, but not on the impact of imperialism on the colonisers themselves, or on the underclasses created in the metropole by colonialism. Commemoration of the anonymous agents and victims of British imperialism in Asia and its backlash among the Irish is a challenge for Asian Studies in Ireland.

Keywords: postcolonialism, discourse analysis, Chinese Studies, Irish Studies



EastAsiaNet 10th Anniversary Research Workshop

Sean Golden recently spoke twice at the EastAsiaNet 10th Anniversary Research Workshop that was held at the University of Coimbra in Portuigal from 26-28 May 2016, dedicated to the New Silk Road in the Context of East Asian Relations and Wider International Implications.

Re-Imagining 'Asia' and 'Europe' along the New Silk Road
Abstract

Brussels continues to look more toward Boston than Beijing. As Frederick John Teggart demonstrated in 1939 in his book Rome and China: A Study of Correlations in Historical Events, major developments in the history of the Roman Empire were preceded and provoked by major developments in the history of the Chinese Empire. As China repelled wave after wave of Central Asian tribes attacking the East, these tribes turned West and successively displaced still more tribes closer and closer to Europe. The Xiongnu lead to the Huns. Yet “European” history still ignores the implications of Teggart’s study and continues to take Europe to be the country in the middle of it all. This Eurocentrism affects countries that span Eurasia, like Russia, and countries that clearly belong to Central or even South Asia, like Iran. The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation and the One Belt, One Road initiative will eventually have as great an impact on Europe’s future as developments in the Chinese Empire had on Europe’s past. What obsolete paradigms prevent analysts and planners from detecting or recognising the consequences of China’s mid-to-long term Eurasian development strategy? And what new paradigms might open their minds? What tools do we need to assess the New Silk Road strategy?

EAN, A Decade of Networking: reflecting on the past, prospects for the future

Pushing Hands with Martha Cheung

Sean Golden has recently published  "Pushing Hands with Martha Cheung: The Genealogy of a Translation Metaphor" in the collection The Pushing-Hands of Translation and its Theory. In memoriam Martha Cheung, 1953-2013 edited by Douglas Robinson and published by Routledge (2016, pp. 34-59).

Hong Kong: Supervised Meritocracy or Unhindered People Power?

The CIDOB Barcelona Centre for International Affairs think tank has published an Opinion on the Occupy Central movement in Hong Kong by Seán Golden, member of the Inter-Asia research group:

Hong Kong: Supervised Meritocracy or Unhindered People Power?, Opinión CIDOB, No. 278, November 2014.

The Party and the World Dialogue 2014


Sean Golden, member of the Inter-Asia research group, was one of more than 60 foreign experts invited to speak about and participate in the debate about the role of the Communist Party of China (CPC) in political and economic reform in the conference The Party and the World Dialogue 2014. China's New reforms: the Role of the Party, organised by the China Center for Contemporary World Studies (CCCWS), a think tank of the International Department of the Central Committee of the CPC in Beijing from 2-8 September 2014.



He spoke on the subject of China's Reforms: Particularities vs. Commonalities and presided over one of the panel discussions on this subject.


The Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB) has signed a Memorandum of Understanding with the CCCWS in order to promote joint research on the role of the CPC in political and economic reform and their consequences for the rest of the world through the UAB's East Asian Studies & Research Centre (Centre d'Estudis i Recerca sobre Àsia Oriental - CERAO).




The Chinese Communist Party in the Eyes of European Scholars / 欧洲学者眼中的中国共产党国际研讨会

Sean Golden, a member of the Inter-Asia research group, participated in the high-level meeting of officials from the Central Committee of the Communst Party of China (CPC) with 15 European scholars that was organised in Copenhagen (Denmark) by the Asia Research Centre (ARC) of Copenhagen Business School (CBS) and the China Centre for Contemporary World Studies (CCCWS) of the International Department of the Central Committee on 11/0612014 to discuss CPC Studies in Europe and the role of the CPC in China.



He delivered a report on Chinese Studies in South Europe and a series of CPC Studies research questions and called for closer cooperation between Chinese think tanks and European think tanks.

Liu Yunshan 刘云山a member of the Standing Committee of the Politburo of theCPC, and other high-level officials, also took part in the meeting.


Research questions for CPC studies: 
  1. Is the CPC a political party or is it the entire political system? Can it really be compared to political parties in Western liberal democracies?
  2. If the most important task of the CPC from the historical point of view was the planning of the economy, and if the CPC renounces central planning of the economy, what is now the most important task of the CPC?
  3. If power comes from the people, and power is exercised on behalf of the people, how can the CPC demonstrate that it is accountable to the people?
  4. What is the importance of economy of scale in political matters? If the EU seems to have learned that it is necessary to create a centralised bureaucracy based on meritocracy --the European Commission-- in order to guarantee planning and continuity (something the Chinese political culture invented thousands of years ago), as well as the separate branches of government (executive, legislative, judiciary), and China already has the centralised bureaucracy, does the CPC need to experiment with the separation of powers that was developed by European political philosophy?
  5. What is the future of "one country, two (or more) systems"?
  6. Should meritocracy as the basis for being selected for a governing position include people who do not belong to the CPC?
  7. If Chinese people say that they have been accustomed for thousands of years to being selected rather than to being elected, in what circumstances does the CPC see elections as a valid and efficient process of selection?
Members of the Chinese delegation:
  • Liu Yunshan 刘云山,Secretary of the CPC central committee, headmaster of Party School of the CPC
  • Chen Xi 陈希Vice-Minister of Organization Department of the CPC Central Committee
  • Liu Biwei 刘碧伟Ambassador of the People’s Republic of China in the Kingdom of Denmark
  • Li Jinjun 李进军Vice-Minister of the International Department of the CPC Central Committee
  • Guo Yezhou 郭业洲Vice-Minister of the International Department of the CPC Central CommitteeChairman of the Council of China Center for Contemporary World Studies
  • Jiang Jinquan 江金权vice-director of Central Policy Research Office of the CPC Central Committee, general secretary of Party-building leadership of the CPC Central Committee
  • Ding Wei 丁伟,vice minister of China’s Ministry of Culture
  • Sun Haiyan 孙海燕, Director of the China Center for Contemporary World Studies (CCCWS) 
European scholars:
  • Mr Kjeld Erik Brødsgaard, Professor and Director of the Asia Research Centre, Copenhagen Business School.
  • Mr Sebastian Heilmann, the founding director of the national Mercator Institute for China Studies (MERICS) in Berlin and professor for the political economy of China at the University of Trier, Germany.
  • Mr Frank Pieke, chair professor in modern China studies at Leiden University.
  • Mr Stig Thøgersen,
  • professor of China Studies at Aarhus University, Denmark.
  • Mr. Martin Jacques, Senior Fellow at the Department of Politics and International Studies, Cambridge University, and a Visiting Professor at Tsinghua University, Beijing.
  • Mr. Sean Golden, full Professor of East Asian Studies and Director of the East Asian Studies & Research Centre – CERAO at the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB).
  • Mr Kerry Brown, Professor of Chinese Politics and Director of the China Studies Centre at the University of Sydney.
  • Mr Flemming Christiansen, Sociological Institute and Institute of East Asian Studies, The University of Duisburg-Essen.
  • Mr Zhengxu Wang, Associate Professor at the School of Contemporary Chinese Studies, University of Nottingham.
  • Mr Nis Grünberg, PhD Fellow at Asia Research Centre, Copenhagen Business School.
  • Ms Sarah Eaton, Associate Professor in Contemporary China Studies at the School of Interdisciplinary Area Studies, University of Oxford.
  • Mr Giovanni Andornino, Assistant Professor of International Relations of East Asia at the University of Torino (Italy); Vice President of the Torino World Affairs Institute.
  • Mr Daniele Brombal, Assistant Professor at the Department of Asian and North African Studies of Venice Ca' Foscari University (Italy).
  • Mr Nis Høyrup Christensen,  Assistant Professor at Asia Research Centre, Copenhagen Business School.
  • Mr Andreas Mulvad, PhD Fellow at the Department of Political Science at the University of Copenhagen. 

EastAsiaNet Research Workshop, Memory in East Asia: Ruptured Pasts, Contested Presents, Uncertain Futures

Sean Golden, member of the Inter-Asia research group, spoke at the EastAsiaNet Research Workshop, Memory in East Asia: Ruptured Pasts, Contested Presents, Uncertain Futures, at the White Rose University East Asia Centre of the University of Sheffield (UK), 24-26/04/2014, on the subject of:.

后折腾时代 houzheteng shidai. From the Cultural Revolution to the Chongqing Model and Beyond. What Have the Children of Yan’an in Mind for the Future?

Abstract

How do the Chinese people –and more specifically, their current leaders-- understand their contemporary experiences in relation to the Maoist period (1956-1976) of the Chinese socialist revolution? How are social institutions, power relations and communications media –including the new ICTs and social networks-- involved in the construction of the corresponding discourses, and what are the implications of memories of Maoism for economic and political, as well as social and cultural relations and institutions, in East Asia and for the 21st century world order? The “Chongqing Model” associated with the now disgraced leader 薄熙 Bo Xilai, contemporary debate about the famine that followed the “Great Leap Forward”, the recent fleeting appearance in the Chinese media of the image of the “tank man” from1989 and the novel «盛世:中國, 2013» by 陳冠中 Chan Koon-chung [“In an Age of Prosperity: China 2013”, published in 2008; published in English as The Fat Years in 2011] will serve as case studies to explore how the past, present and future are mediated, negotiated and embedded in public discourses through discursive practices in contemporary China. Chan Koon-chang portrays a fictitious –but ominously realistic-- collective amnesia. The Famine seemed to have disappeared from collective memory and the events of 1989 are taboo in public, yet efforts are being made to restore those memories. People marginalised by the processes of 改革开放 gǎigékāifàng recur to Maoist terminology and analyses to defend their rights. The Party condemns Bo Xilai for his policy of “唱红chàng hóng singing red songs but 习近 Xi Jinping uses 毛文體 [毛文体] Mào wéntǐ “MaoSpeak” to structure his own discourse on the 中國夢 Zhōngguó mèng “Chinese Dream”. What do the 延安儿女 Yán'ān ér-nǚ “Children of Yan’an” think about the past? And what have they in mind for the future?

Interview with Sean Golden

On 14 February 2014, in the context of the PhD/Masters programme in Translation & Intercultural Studies of the Universitat Rovira i Virgili (URV) and as part of their series of  Interviews with translation scholars, Prof. Anthony Pym interviewed Sean Golden, a member of the Inter-Asia research group. This interview is also available at Translation Scholars on Facebook and the European Society for Translation Studies Video resources - interviews.
Additional videos of Sean Golden giving lectures are available at:
Hong Kong Baptist University - Translation Seminar Series - Public Lecture
19 November 2009
[presented by Seán Golden; organized by Centre for Translation, Hong Kong Baptist University]
[1 streaming video file (124 min.) : digital, stereo., WMV file]
Summary: "Tracing the history of the history of the construction and deconstruction of colonial discourse in China and in Ireland, and its effect on the construction of new "modern" identities in both cases, is complicated, but case studies of these processes, such as those offered here, will add a new dimension to postcolonialist considerations of the construction of a British colonial discourse in China and in Ireland."--Homepage of Centre for Translation
-----
VIU Lecture 2010 - The Crisis of Modernity in China
Venice International University - VIU Lectures
Sean Golden, Universitat Autonòma de Barcelona and Tiziana Lippiello, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia in collaboration with the Department of East Asian Studies, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
Part 1 [9:10 minutes]
Part 2 [9:42 minutes]
Part 3 [8:27 minutes]
Part 4 [9:07 minutes]

12th EastAsiaNet Research Workshop

Sean Golden, a member of the Inter-Asia research group, gave a talk at the 12th EastAsiaNet Research Workshop organised by the Institut d'Asie Orientale - Sciences-Po Lyon and the Institut d'Etudes Transtextuelles et Transculturelles - Université Jean-Moulin Lyon 3, on 17-18 October 2013, dedicated to: 

Future Cities and Space Reconfiguration in East Asia: Practices and Representations, Risk and Opportunities 

on the topic of:

Urban policies and governance of the risks of urban environmental calamities and urban development: a discourse analysis of official and non-official communication

Abstract


This paper will present a case study of three sources of discourse for the communication of urban ecological risk in the PRC and its subsequent management. The three sources are: the discourse of informal, nongovernmental or emergent civil society communication of ecological risk (social movements, protest movements, critical analysis of risk and governmental policy); the discourse of formal or academic, nongovernmental communication of ecological risk (academics, advisers, opinion-makers); the official, governmental communication of ecological risk (official think tanks, ministry documents). New political terminology is emerging, whose analysis can reveal contemporary tensions in social, economic and political policy-making. One the one hand, terms such as “social construction” 社会建设  shèhuì jiànshè, “social system reform” 社会體制改革 shèhuì tízhì gǎigé“ or social self-governance” 社會自治 [社会自治] shèhuī zìzhì might imply a growing role for Chinese "civil society" 民间社会 mínjiān shèhuì. On the other hand, terms and statements such as  “social management” 社会管理  shèhuì guǎnlǐ, "stability preservation" 维护稳定 wéihù wěndìng/维稳 wéiwěn or “‘civil society’ is a ‘Western pitfall’” 公民社会是西方陷阱 gōngmín shèhuì shì xīfāng xiànjǐng seem to imply serious opposition to social or political reform. In 2010, 习近平 Xi Jinping told Party members in a speech at the Central Party School that “power is given by the people, and power is used for the people.” In 2011, 周本順  Zhōu Běnshùn, secretary of the Party’s Central Politics and Law Commission, attacked the idea of social organizations working independently of the government, saying China had to avoid the “pitfall of ‘civil society’ designed for us by certain Western nations.” Now the debate is centering around what the "Chinese Dream" 中國夢 Zhōngguó mèng might be. Three cases of urban planning and governance --Chongqing 重慶, Guangzhou  广州 and Wukan 烏坎-- provide three contrasting visions of urban policies and governance of the risks of urban environmental calamities and urban development.




EACS Summer School in Chinese Studies



The EACS Summer School in Chinese Studies 2013 was dedicated to History and Historiography in Imperial China and the Encounter with the West. Seán Golden spoke on The Role and Meaning of Imperial History in Contemporary China.

Linking Ancient and Contemporary: Continuities and Discontinuities in Chinese History of Literature and Thought

The Dipartimento di Studi sull'Asia esull'Africa Mediterranea (DSAAM) of the Università Ca'Foscari Venezia, in collaboration with the Department of Chinese Language and Literature of  北京大学 Peking University, organised an international conference in Venice from  21-22 March  2013 on the subject of "Linking Ancient and Contemporary:Continuities and Discontinuities in Chinese History of Literature andThought".  

Sean Golden, a member of the Inter-Asia research Group, spoke at the conference on the subject of “Liu Xie 劉勰s Wénxīn Diāolóng 文心雕, Ernest Fenollosa’s complete The Chinese Written Character as a Medium for Poetry and 20th century avant garde American writing outside the Ezra Pound tradition”. 

Abstract

Ezra Pound’s edition of Ernest Fenollosa’s manuscripts for The Chinese Written Character as a Medium for Poetry was a landmark in modernist European poetry and the imagist movement at the beginning of the 20th century. Pound’s work has stood for Fenollosa’s vision since then and has been the subject of controversy among Sinologist’s for its emphasis on the graphic elements of Chinese written characters. A recent edition of the complete Fenollosa manuscripts by Haun Saussy, Jonathan Stalling and Lucas Klein has made it possible to see the differences between Fenollosa’s interests and Pound’s interpretations and to restore Fenollosa’s original intentions. Even though Sinologists have questioned the Fenollosa-Pound emphasis on the graphic elements of Chinese writing as a component part of Chinese poetry, Chapter 39 of the classical Chinese text  文心雕 Wénxīn diāolóng by  劉勰 Liu Xie (ca. 466-ca. 520) refers specifically to this phenomenon as a mode in the composition of Chinese poetry. Case studies of work by John Cage and Jackson Mac Low show that Fenollosa’s impact on 20th century avant garde literature went far beyond the works of Ezra Pound.